Outcome: Dismissed
APR032025_01B2203
Our summary
A consultant and business analyst, who first sought a national interest waiver, claimed three extraordinary ability criteria: membership, original contributions and leading role. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the membership claim rested on training certifications, not qualifying association membership, making three criteria impossible. It reserved the other two criteria.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Membership · Agile training certificates were not shown to be association memberships requiring outstanding achievements judged by experts.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Agile training certificates were not shown to be association memberships requiring outstanding achievements judged by experts. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed because the petitioner could not reach three criteria numerically. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed because the petitioner could not reach three criteria numerically. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not required because the initial three-criterion requirement was not met. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
