Draft with the record,
verify as you write.
A professional drafting instrument for attorneys — evidence-anchored, officer-readable petition sections, generated section by section from the Case File, checked for hallucinated citations before they ever reach a filing.
What the attorney gets.
Sections drafted from the record, not a blank page.
Every sentence traces to an exhibit or is flagged honestly — [NEEDS EXHIBIT] where the record is thin, [ATTORNEY: confirm] where only the client can say.
A Draft Intelligence rail, not just prose.
Every generated section arrives with the exhibits it used, what still needs evidence, what the client needs to confirm, and where an officer would push back.
Check this draft before anyone else does.
One click reruns Petition Studio's analysis, a consistency check, and a citation-integrity scan — any AAO identifier that doesn't match a real retrieved decision gets flagged.
The first draft is where attorney hours disappear.
Every section starts from a blank page.
Re-reading exhibits and re-deriving the argument structure for each criterion section eats hours before any actual drafting happens.
A generic AI draft can't be trusted without a second read.
Fabricated citations and unanchored claims from a general-purpose chatbot have to be caught by hand, exhibit by exhibit.
Sections drafted separately repeat themselves.
Without shared context, each section re-narrates the same exhibit instead of referencing it briefly, bloating the petition.
Why a general chatbot can't safely draft a petition section.
A drafting tool that can fabricate a citation isn't saving an attorney time — it's creating review work.
It has no access to your client's actual record.
A general-purpose AI drafts from what it's told in the moment — with no persistent, structured Case File, nothing keeps it anchored to real exhibits.
It can invent a plausible-sounding AAO citation.
Without a retrieval step and a deterministic backstop, a chatbot can cite a decision identifier that doesn't exist — AI Drafter's integrity check exists specifically to catch this.
It doesn't remember what the last section already said.
Each chat turn drafts in isolation — no anti-repetition, no shared narrative, no awareness of what's already been argued.
Draft with the record. Verify as you write.
How a section gets drafted.
Choose a section to draft.
Pick one of your sections and add an instruction if you want one. Your Case File, your story and the AAO excerpts feed the draft.
Drafted paragraph by paragraph.
The Scribe writes the section one paragraph at a time, each tied to the exhibits it rests on.
Every paragraph says what it still needs.
Its exhibits, what is still needed and what the attorney should confirm, right under it.
Three moves, and the next section.
What to do next, who can do it and how long it takes; then the section to draft next, and a PDF.
EVERY PARAGRAPH SHOWS ITS EXHIBITS
Every section,
anchored to the record.
Draft generates section by section straight from the Case File, every paragraph showing the exhibits it rests on and a note wherever an exhibit is still needed.
Draft the first version. Attorney owns the last mile.
Talk to us about Counsel