Your best evidence
isn't in your documents yet.
An interview, not a document scan — Achievement Miner asks period by period what you actually did, then turns your own words into evidence candidates tagged to the right criteria, with one honest follow-up whenever documentation is missing.
What the interview surfaces.
A structured interview, not a blank textbox.
Four periods — education, professional experience, recognition & impact, current & future work — each with its own specific prompt, so nothing gets missed just because you didn't think to mention it.
Turns your own words into evidence candidates.
Each achievement you describe becomes a structured evidence candidate, tagged to the criteria it actually supports — reviewed by you before it ever counts as real evidence.
One honest follow-up when proof is missing.
When you mention something you can't yet document, Achievement Miner asks exactly one clarifying question — instead of quietly treating your word as proof.
The achievements that matter most are the ones you never wrote down.
Real accomplishments rarely leave a paper trail on their own.
A promotion, a fix that shipped, a talk you gave — the things that actually demonstrate your standing often exist only in memory.
A blank "list your achievements" field draws a blank.
Most people can't reconstruct years of work from an empty text box — the right question at the right time is what surfaces it.
Without a check, a described achievement can quietly become "proof."
It's easy to describe something as settled fact when it's really an unverified claim — and easy for that gap to go unnoticed until an officer finds it first.
Why a chatbot can't run this interview.
A single open-ended prompt and a structured, criterion-aware interview are not the same kind of question.
It won't ask period by period.
Without a structured interview, one open-ended prompt misses whole categories of achievement a person doesn't think to volunteer unprompted.
It won't tag an achievement to the criterion it actually supports.
Turning a described achievement into evidence requires knowing your case's own regulatory framework — a generic assistant has no such mapping.
It won't flag its own gaps.
A chatbot optimized to be agreeable has no incentive to ask the one clarifying question that catches an unverified claim before it's treated as evidence.
Interview the evidence out. Never invent it.
How an interview becomes evidence.
Pick a period.
Education, professional experience, recognition and impact, or current and future work, one period at a time.
Describe it in your own words.
Say what you did, where, when and who noticed. Each achievement is taken only from your words and matched to the exhibits in your Case File.
Review what it found.
Each find names the criteria it could support and whether you hold a document for it. A find without one becomes a task in one click.
Answer the one question that helps most.
When something is missing, the Prospector asks one question; your answer starts a new run.
EVIDENCE CANDIDATE — REVIEW BEFORE IT COUNTS
Your own words,
turned into evidence.
An interview walks period by period through what you actually did, not a document scan guessing at it. What you describe becomes a tagged evidence candidate you review before it's added.
The evidence was always there. Now it's written down.
Start your free trial