Skip to content
Expert Finder

Real researchers who
already know your work.

Expert Finder searches the researchers who cited your work, deterministically excludes co-authors and shared-institution researchers, and ranks who's left by citing engagement — real candidates for an independent support letter, not a cold-call list.

Start your free trial
01

What gets verified.

01

Independence is checked, not assumed.

Self-citations, shared authorship with the petitioner, and same-current-institution researchers are excluded deterministically — what's left has a real, checkable basis for independence.

Excludes co-authorsExcludes shared institutionDeterministic, not AI-guessed
02

Ranked by real citing engagement.

Candidates are ranked by how many of your works they actually cited, then by their own publication record — real institution, real h-index, real citing-work count.

Real institutionReal h-indexRanked by engagement
03

One click into Expert Letter Studio.

A candidate's "Start letter" button flows straight into Expert Letter Studio with their independence basis attached — no dead-end contact list to work from alone.

Direct handoffIndependence basis attachedNo dead end
02

A cold-call list of "experts" wastes everyone's time.

FiledDay 1
Receipt noticeMonth 1
No updateMonth 3
No updateMonth 6
No updateMonth 9
RFE issuedMonth 10

A co-author isn't an independent witness.

Recommending a frequent collaborator as an "independent" expert is exactly the kind of shortcut that invites scrutiny.

Manually checking every citing author's history doesn't scale.

Verifying that a candidate never co-authored with you or shared your institution means digging through publication records one name at a time.

A list of names isn't a plan.

Finding a candidate is only half the problem — without a drafting starting point, the list just sits there.

03

Why a chatbot can't find you an independent expert.

A plausible-sounding name is not the same as a checked one.

It has no real citation graph to search.

General-purpose AI doesn't have access to a live, queryable record of who actually cited your specific work — it can only guess at plausible-sounding names.

It can't run a real independence check.

Determining co-authorship and shared-institution overlap requires structured data lookups, not a language model's best guess.

It stops at a name, not a next step.

Even a correct name is just a dead end without a drafting starting point that carries the independence basis forward.

Real citations. Checked independence. One click to draft.

04

How a search runs.

01

Your author record is matched.

Your name or ORCID is matched to your real publication and citation record.

02

Independence is checked automatically.

Self-citations, co-authors on your 25 most-cited works, and same-current-institution researchers are excluded deterministically.

03

Remaining candidates are ranked.

By citing engagement first, then their own publication record — real institution, real h-index.

04

Start a letter in one click.

Start letter opens Expert Letter Studio with the expert's name and record already filled in.

INDEPENDENCE, CHECKED NOT ASSUMED

Start your free trial

Real researchers,
ranked by engagement.

A search over who cited your work deterministically excludes co-authors and shared-institution researchers first. What's ranked afterward is only the independent citations left standing.

Find who already knows your work.

Start your free trial