EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided April 2021Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
APR052021_05B2203
AwardsNot metHigh salaryNot metJudgingNot metLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metScholarly articlesNot metMembershipClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Administrative services manager claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. AAO dismissed motions to reopen and reconsider because petitioner failed to provide new evidence timely, did not demonstrate erroneous application of law, and did not establish any of the eight evidentiary criteria.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner did not establish receipt of major internationally recognized award
- High salary · Claimed but motion provided only previously submitted documentation and new late evidence
- Judging · Claimed but motion provided only previously submitted documentation and new late evidence
- Leading or critical role · Claimed but motion provided only previously submitted documentation and new late evidence
- Original contributions · Claimed but motion did not overcome prior analysis; new evidence not timely submitted
- Scholarly articles · Motion did not address this criterion or provide new evidence
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to meet any of the evidentiary criteria
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Petitioner did not establish receipt of major internationally recognized award |
 High salary | Not met | Claimed but motion provided only previously submitted documentation and new late evidence |
 Judging | Not met | Claimed but motion provided only previously submitted documentation and new late evidence |
 Leading or critical role | Not met | Claimed but motion provided only previously submitted documentation and new late evidence |
 Original contributions | Not met | Claimed but motion did not overcome prior analysis; new evidence not timely submitted |
 Scholarly articles | Not met | Motion did not address this criterion or provide new evidence |
 Membership | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in prior appeal; motion did not provide new evidence |
 Published material | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in prior appeal; motion did not provide new evidence |
 Final merits | Not met | Petitioner failed to meet any of the evidentiary criteria |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.