Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided April 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

APR092025_06B2203

Leading or critical roleMetAwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Sales and marketing specialist from Kuwait/Jordan seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed six criteria including awards, published material, and original contributions. AAO found only leading critical role met. Serious credibility issues and lack of corroboration for claims prevented satisfaction of three required criteria.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner met this criterion.

What was missing

  • Awards · Honorary doctorate and other certificates lack documented national or international recognition; institution reputation not established.
  • Original contributions · Patent uncompleted; other claims lack corroboration; no objective evidence of major significance.
  • Published material · Publication is not a professional or major trade publication; inclusion criteria not demonstrated.
  • Final merits · Petitioner does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or a career of acclaimed work at the very top of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Leading or critical roleMetDirector found petitioner met this criterion.
AwardsNot metHonorary doctorate and other certificates lack documented national or international recognition; institution reputation not established.
Original contributionsNot metPatent uncompleted; other claims lack corroboration; no objective evidence of major significance.
Published materialNot metPublication is not a professional or major trade publication; inclusion criteria not demonstrated.
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed by petitioner.
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed by petitioner.
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed by petitioner.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed by petitioner.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed by petitioner.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed separately; subsumed in original contributions discussion.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or a career of acclaimed work at the very top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.