Outcome: Dismissed
APR092025_06B2203
Our summary
Sales and marketing specialist from Kuwait/Jordan seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed six criteria including awards, published material, and original contributions. AAO found only leading critical role met. Serious credibility issues and lack of corroboration for claims prevented satisfaction of three required criteria.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner met this criterion.
What was missing
- Awards · Honorary doctorate and other certificates lack documented national or international recognition; institution reputation not established.
- Original contributions · Patent uncompleted; other claims lack corroboration; no objective evidence of major significance.
- Published material · Publication is not a professional or major trade publication; inclusion criteria not demonstrated.
- Final merits · Petitioner does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or a career of acclaimed work at the very top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met this criterion. | |
| Not met | Honorary doctorate and other certificates lack documented national or international recognition; institution reputation not established. | |
| Not met | Patent uncompleted; other claims lack corroboration; no objective evidence of major significance. | |
| Not met | Publication is not a professional or major trade publication; inclusion criteria not demonstrated. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed by petitioner. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed by petitioner. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed by petitioner. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed by petitioner. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed by petitioner. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed separately; subsumed in original contributions discussion. | |
| Not met | Petitioner does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or a career of acclaimed work at the very top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
