EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2017Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
APR102017_01B2203
ExhibitionsMetPublished materialMetAwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A sculptor sought extraordinary ability classification in the arts. The director found only the exhibition criterion met. The AAO found two criteria satisfied, published material and exhibitions, while awards and original contributions failed for lack of evidence of recognition or impact, so fewer than three were established.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Her work was displayed at artistic exhibitions, consistent with the director's finding.
- Published material · Interview transcript with required details was published in major media, so the criterion was satisfied.
What was missing
- Awards · No documentation showing the honorable mention carried national or international recognition for excellence in the field.
- Original contributions · Exhibition participation and certificates did not show impact or major significance in the field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Exhibitions | Met | Her work was displayed at artistic exhibitions, consistent with the director's finding. |
 Published material | Met | Interview transcript with required details was published in major media, so the criterion was satisfied. |
 Awards | Not met | No documentation showing the honorable mention carried national or international recognition for excellence in the field. |
 Original contributions | Not met | Exhibition participation and certificates did not show impact or major significance in the field. |
 Leading or critical role | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed earlier but conceded on appeal, so the decision did not address it. |
 Final merits | Not reached / not discussed | Only two criteria were met, so a full final merits determination was not required. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.