Outcome: Dismissed
APR172024_02B2203
Our summary
An athlete in an unpopular U.S. sport met two criteria on initial review. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to explain how post-filing awards applied to the original petition, made only generalized appeals without specific arguments, and did not justify why regulatory criteria did not apply to his field.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Service center director found criterion satisfied.
- Membership · Service center director found criterion satisfied.
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · Service center director concluded criterion not satisfied.
- Published material · Service center director concluded criterion not satisfied.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Service center director found criterion satisfied. | |
| Met | Service center director found criterion satisfied. | |
| Not met | Service center director concluded criterion not satisfied. | |
| Not met | Service center director concluded criterion not satisfied. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
