Outcome: Dismissed
APR172025_06B5203
Our summary
A real estate and urban development entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability, with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding fewer than three of the six regulatory criteria met, and reserved the final merits and Dhanasar questions as unnecessary to decide.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | Reserved; petitioner failed the threshold EB-2 exceptional ability requirement, so the Dhanasar framework was not reached. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Reserved; Dhanasar analysis not reached because underlying EB-2 eligibility was not established. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Reserved; Dhanasar analysis not reached because underlying EB-2 eligibility was not established. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
