Outcome: Dismissed
APR172026_02B2203
Our summary
A visual artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The service center found one criterion met (exhibitions) but not three required. On appeal, the petitioner claimed awards, membership, published material, and leading role. The AAO rejected the awards claim, finding nominations insufficient and team awards lacking individual recognition. Only one criterion satisfied; threshold unmet; appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · SCOPS determined this criterion satisfied; not disturbed on appeal
What was missing
- Awards · Nominations do not constitute receipt of awards; team awards lack evidence of petitioner's individual excellence
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | SCOPS determined this criterion satisfied; not disturbed on appeal | |
| Not met | Nominations do not constitute receipt of awards; team awards lack evidence of petitioner's individual excellence | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed on appeal; waived | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Threshold criteria not met (only one of three required); final merits reserved |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
