O-1AArts, design, architectureEmployerDecided 2018Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
APR232018_01D8101
AwardsNot metJudgingNot metLeading or critical roleNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Competition wins not corroborated as significant or nationally recognized.
- Judging · No evidence of judging work of others in hairstyling field.
- Leading or critical role · No evidence of lead, starring, or critical role with distinguished organizations.
- Published material · Coverage on local television and mobile app insufficient; not major publications.
- Final merits · Even if criteria met, totality of evidence insufficient for extraordinary ability in arts.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Competition wins not corroborated as significant or nationally recognized. |
 Judging | Not met | No evidence of judging work of others in hairstyling field. |
 Leading or critical role | Not met | No evidence of lead, starring, or critical role with distinguished organizations. |
 Published material | Not met | Coverage on local television and mobile app insufficient; not major publications. |
 Final merits | Not met | Even if criteria met, totality of evidence insufficient for extraordinary ability in arts. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.