Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided April 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

APR252025_04B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Paralegal seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner did not establish exceptional ability, meeting only two of six required criteria. Failure to qualify for underlying EB-2 classification rendered NIW analysis unnecessary.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedPetitioner ineligible for EB-2 as individual of exceptional ability; NIW eligibility not reached.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedPetitioner ineligible for EB-2; Dhanasar analysis reserved.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedPetitioner ineligible for EB-2; Dhanasar analysis reserved.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.