EB-1AComputer science and AIIndividualDecided 2017Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
APR262017_01B2203
Scholarly articlesMetExhibitionsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot met
Our summary
Computer engineering researcher claims extraordinary ability. Met only one criterion: scholarly articles. AAO found original contributions lacked evidence of major significance; rejected other criteria. Did not establish sustained acclaim or position at top of field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Scholarly articles · Authored articles published in professional journals
What was missing
- Exhibitions · Computer engineering presentations not artistic exhibitions or showcases; scientific presentations excluded
- Leading or critical role · No evidence of leading role for organization with distinguished reputation
- Original contributions · Research early stage; no evidence contributions have influenced field or major significance achieved
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Scholarly articles | Met | Authored articles published in professional journals |
 Exhibitions | Not met | Computer engineering presentations not artistic exhibitions or showcases; scientific presentations excluded |
 Leading or critical role | Not met | No evidence of leading role for organization with distinguished reputation |
 Original contributions | Not met | Research early stage; no evidence contributions have influenced field or major significance achieved |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.