Outcome: Dismissed
APR262018_01B2203
Our summary
A violinist seeks EB-1A classification through an employer petitioner. Claimed judging, exhibitions, published material, membership and awards. AAO found three criteria met but dismissed appeal because evidence does not demonstrate sustained international acclaim or placement among the very top violinists.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Performed at multiple festivals, establishing artistic display criterion
- Judging · Served on jury panel for festival, satisfying the criterion
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award like Oscar or Grammy demonstrated
- Membership · Membership does not require outstanding achievements by recognized experts
- Published material · Single television appearance three years ago insufficient for sustained acclaim
- Scholarly articles · Record does not show articles are scholarly in nature
- Final merits · Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Performed at multiple festivals, establishing artistic display criterion | |
| Met | Served on jury panel for festival, satisfying the criterion | |
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award like Oscar or Grammy demonstrated | |
| Not met | Membership does not require outstanding achievements by recognized experts | |
| Not met | Single television appearance three years ago insufficient for sustained acclaim | |
| Not met | Record does not show articles are scholarly in nature | |
| Not met | Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
