EB-1AElectrical and electronic engineeringIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
APR272005_10B2203
AwardsNot metJudgingNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metScholarly articlesNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Electrical engineer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed multiple criteria including awards, membership, publications, judging, original contributions, and scholarly articles. The AAO found insufficient evidence for any criterion; petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or distinguish himself significantly from others in the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in electrical engineering.
- Judging · No evidence of voting on balloting committees; lacks criteria showing distinction from others.
- Membership · Membership does not require outstanding achievement; local or regional chapter evaluation insufficient.
- Original contributions · Wireless network design and patent applications lack evidence of major significance or widespread influence.
- Published material · Article cited only scholastic achievements, not work in the field.
- Scholarly articles · Publication alone is not presumptive evidence of sustained acclaim; lacks significant research community reaction.
- Final merits · Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | No nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in electrical engineering. |
 Judging | Not met | No evidence of voting on balloting committees; lacks criteria showing distinction from others. |
 Membership | Not met | Membership does not require outstanding achievement; local or regional chapter evaluation insufficient. |
 Original contributions | Not met | Wireless network design and patent applications lack evidence of major significance or widespread influence. |
 Published material | Not met | Article cited only scholastic achievements, not work in the field. |
 Scholarly articles | Not met | Publication alone is not presumptive evidence of sustained acclaim; lacks significant research community reaction. |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.