IT project manager sought NIW as individual of exceptional ability. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner met only two of six exceptional ability criteria (academic records and work experience); withdrawal of third criterion (professional membership) left petitioner below minimum threshold, and underlying eligibility failure precluded NIW analysis.

An inventor and entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. The AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria and lacked ten years full-time experience. Without EB-2 eligibility, NIW was unreachable and petition remains denied.

Inventor and entrepreneur seeking EB-2 NIW claimed patent applications and competition wins as evidence. AAO held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability under regulatory criteria and did not qualify for EB-2 classification, so NIW eligibility was not reached.

Entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability with NIW. AAO dismissed appeal finding petitioner met only two of required three criteria: academic record and membership. Petitioner failed to demonstrate license criterion applied and recognition for achievements; Dhanasar analysis not reached.