Outcome: Dismissed
APR282025_04B2203
Our summary
Technology entrepreneur in hospitality industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed nine evidentiary criteria but failed to meet minimum three. AAO dismissed, finding venture capital funding inadequately documented and membership criterion not properly established; other criteria not analyzed as threshold requirement not met.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Venture capital funding did not satisfy criterion; no evidence petitioner was motivating factor for funding
- Membership · Did not establish membership judged by recognized national or international experts
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Venture capital funding did not satisfy criterion; no evidence petitioner was motivating factor for funding | |
| Not met | Did not establish membership judged by recognized national or international experts | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in detail | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in detail | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in detail | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in detail | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in detail | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not fully analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in detail |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
