Outcome: Dismissed
APR282026_01B2203
Our summary
Psychologist and psychology school founder in Kazakhstan claims extraordinary ability. Met published material criterion and meets judging criterion on appeal review. Failed to demonstrate original contributions of major significance or sufficient evidence on other criteria. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner did not satisfy three initial evidentiary criteria threshold.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · AAO withdrew SCOPS determination and concluded petitioner meets this criterion based on evaluator participation
- Published material · Service center determined criterion met; petitioner did not contest on appeal
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | AAO withdrew SCOPS determination and concluded petitioner meets this criterion based on evaluator participation | |
| Met | Service center determined criterion met; petitioner did not contest on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; petitioner contested SCOPS but record lacks sufficient documentation | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed on appeal; petitioner waived this issue | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed on appeal; petitioner waived this issue | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed on appeal; petitioner waived this issue | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached; petitioner did not meet initial evidence requirements threshold |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
