EB-1AComputer science and AIIndividualDecided April 2024Remanded
Outcome: Remanded
APR302024_02B2203
Leading or critical roleMetOriginal contributionsMetScholarly articlesMetFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
CEO in artificial intelligence and telecommunications seeks extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed three criteria; AAO found two additional criteria met beyond Director's initial finding. Remanded for final merits determination on sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner performed in leading or critical roles with distinguished organizations.
- Original contributions · Letters from experts addressed significance of AI technology patents; contributions of major significance established.
- Scholarly articles · AAO found petitioner met criterion based on submitted evidence of articles.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Leading or critical role | Met | Director found petitioner performed in leading or critical roles with distinguished organizations. |
 Original contributions | Met | Letters from experts addressed significance of AI technology patents; contributions of major significance established. |
 Scholarly articles | Met | AAO found petitioner met criterion based on submitted evidence of articles. |
 Final merits | Not reached / not discussed | Initial criteria satisfied but final merits determination not reached; remanded for Service Center review. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.