Outcome: Dismissed
AUG022024_01B2203
Our summary
A Taekwon-Do athlete from Kyrgyzstan seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner did not establish a major award or meet three evidentiary criteria; the judging and published material criteria were not satisfied, and the overall record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Judging · Certificate recognizing help judging at one three-day event insufficient without supporting detail on judging duties.
- Published material · Interview article and TV appearance lack evidence of publication in major media or major trade publications; author not identified.
- Final merits · Record in aggregate does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Certificate recognizing help judging at one three-day event insufficient without supporting detail on judging duties. | |
| Not met | Interview article and TV appearance lack evidence of publication in major media or major trade publications; author not identified. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or addressed; other criteria examined instead. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion claimed but not explicitly analyzed; deemed waived and not addressed in decision. | |
| Not met | Record in aggregate does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
