Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
O-1ASports and athleticsAgentDecided 2015Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

AUG052015_01D8101

AwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards not established as nationally or internationally recognized; insufficient documentation of competition scope and significance.
  • Leading or critical role · Swim instruction not established to fall within expertise as competitive swimmer; insufficient nexus to athletic ability.
  • Final merits · Failed to meet initial three-criterion threshold; extraordinary ability not demonstrated.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metAwards not established as nationally or internationally recognized; insufficient documentation of competition scope and significance.
Leading or critical roleNot metSwim instruction not established to fall within expertise as competitive swimmer; insufficient nexus to athletic ability.
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedCriterion named in regulation but petitioner raised no claim; not analyzed by decision.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedCriterion named in regulation but petitioner raised no claim; not analyzed by decision.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedCriterion named in regulation but petitioner raised no claim; not analyzed by decision.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedCriterion named in regulation but petitioner raised no claim; not analyzed by decision.
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedCriterion named in regulation but petitioner raised no claim; not analyzed by decision.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedCriterion named in regulation but petitioner raised no claim; not analyzed by decision.
Final meritsNot metFailed to meet initial three-criterion threshold; extraordinary ability not demonstrated.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.