Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

AUG122005_08B2203

AwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Self-petitioner seeks EB-1A classification as business person with extraordinary ability. Claimed awards, membership, published material, and leading role criteria. AAO rejected all criteria and concluded beneficiary is successful regional businessman without sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Community development grant proposal written after petition filing does not constitute prize or award.
  • Leading or critical role · Being successful business leader in regional market does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.
  • Membership · Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and BBB membership do not demonstrate outstanding achievement or extraordinary ability.
  • Published material · Newspaper articles lack certified translations and do not establish published material about beneficiary meeting criterion.
  • Final merits · Evidence shows successful regional furniture business, but not sustained national or international acclaim placing beneficiary at very top.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metCommunity development grant proposal written after petition filing does not constitute prize or award.
Leading or critical roleNot metBeing successful business leader in regional market does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.
MembershipNot metHispanic Chamber of Commerce and BBB membership do not demonstrate outstanding achievement or extraordinary ability.
Published materialNot metNewspaper articles lack certified translations and do not establish published material about beneficiary meeting criterion.
Final meritsNot metEvidence shows successful regional furniture business, but not sustained national or international acclaim placing beneficiary at very top.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.