Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

AUG122005_22B2203

AwardsNot metJudgingNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Gymnastics coach self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability in athletics. AAO found petitioner met zero of criteria analyzed; though well-regarded by peers and employer, record lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim as gymnast or coach.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · No corroborative evidence of claimed Olympic participation; certificate lacked explanation of significance
  • Judging · Judging duties inherent to employment as coach do not demonstrate national or international acclaim outside routine occupation
  • Original contributions · Letters from colleagues cannot establish major significance beyond those who worked directly with petitioner
  • Published material · Newspaper article excerpt lacks proper documentation and does not constitute major media coverage meeting criterion
  • Final merits · Failed to meet at least three criteria; well-regarded coach but no sustained national or international acclaim at top level

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metNo corroborative evidence of claimed Olympic participation; certificate lacked explanation of significance
JudgingNot metJudging duties inherent to employment as coach do not demonstrate national or international acclaim outside routine occupation
Original contributionsNot metLetters from colleagues cannot establish major significance beyond those who worked directly with petitioner
Published materialNot metNewspaper article excerpt lacks proper documentation and does not constitute major media coverage meeting criterion
Final meritsNot metFailed to meet at least three criteria; well-regarded coach but no sustained national or international acclaim at top level

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.