Outcome: Dismissed
AUG152017_01D8101
Our summary
An agent sought O-1A classification for an actor beneficiary. The beneficiary satisfied only one of six required criteria; the decision found insufficient evidence of future leading roles and failed to provide required consultation from a peer group in performing arts, resulting in dismissal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · Beneficiary participated in leading role in production with distinguished reputation but record lacks evidence she will do so in the future.
- Published material · Articles and media coverage do not satisfy requirement for critical reviews in major publications about the beneficiary.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Beneficiary participated in leading role in production with distinguished reputation but record lacks evidence she will do so in the future. | |
| Not met | Articles and media coverage do not satisfy requirement for critical reviews in major publications about the beneficiary. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | No claim or analysis of judging criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | No claim or analysis of membership criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | No claim or analysis of original contributions criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | No claim or analysis of scholarly articles criterion. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
