Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided 2018Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

AUG152018_01B2203

ExhibitionsMetPublished materialMetOriginal contributionsNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A filmmaker and film producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed to meet three criteria: published material, original contributions, and exhibitions. The AAO found published material and exhibitions met but rejected original contributions as lacking demonstration of major significance. The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the required sustained national or international acclaim.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Decision states petitioner established this criterion regarding display of work
  • Published material · Director found petitioner met this criterion; articles and television coverage in major media

What was missing

  • Original contributions · Reference letters praise work but do not demonstrate major significance to the field
  • Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetDecision states petitioner established this criterion regarding display of work
Published materialMetDirector found petitioner met this criterion; articles and television coverage in major media
Original contributionsNot metReference letters praise work but do not demonstrate major significance to the field
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner had no major internationally recognized award
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or mentioned in decision
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or mentioned in decision
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or mentioned in decision
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or mentioned in decision
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or mentioned in decision
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or mentioned in decision
Final meritsNot metRecord does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.