Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided August 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

AUG172026_03B2203

JudgingMetPublished materialMetAwardsNot metMembershipNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A franchise development businessman sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed ten criteria and demonstrated two: published material and judging. The AAO affirmed denial, finding he failed to meet at least three criteria, satisfied no major award, and lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Petitioner fulfilled criterion for participation as judge of others' work.
  • Published material · Petitioner fulfilled criterion for published materials about him in professional publications.

What was missing

  • Awards · Petitioner did not demonstrate receipt of nationally or internationally recognized awards or prizes for excellence in business franchise development.
  • Membership · Petitioner did not establish membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement judged by recognized experts in franchise development field.
  • Final merits · Petitioner did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among top of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetPetitioner fulfilled criterion for participation as judge of others' work.
Published materialMetPetitioner fulfilled criterion for published materials about him in professional publications.
AwardsNot metPetitioner did not demonstrate receipt of nationally or internationally recognized awards or prizes for excellence in business franchise development.
MembershipNot metPetitioner did not establish membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement judged by recognized experts in franchise development field.
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.