A postdoctoral researcher in geology and environmental science sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO accepted advanced degree status but dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor was vague and inconsistent, so national importance was not shown under the first Dhanasar prong, and the other prongs were not reached.

Medical physicist sought EB-2 classification with NIW, proposing radiation therapy detector research using CdTe semiconductor material. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance it.

A research scientist with Ph.D. in industrial engineering employed since 2021 sought EB-2 NIW for developing privacy-enhancing technology in digital advertising and healthcare. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding inadequately documented prospective national importance. Though research has merit, the petitioner failed to demonstrate specific focus or impact rising to national importance. Later Dhanasar prongs were not reached.

Historian with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for expert witness services and market analysis. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance: no evidence of broader impact, economic effects, or industry innovations required by Dhanasar first prong.