Outcome: Dismissed
AUG212024_01B2203
Our summary
A chemistry professor seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed satisfaction of multiple criteria including original contributions (criterion v) and two others (iv, vi). AAO affirmed director's finding that original contributions did not demonstrate major significance and that petitioner failed to meet three criteria required. Appeal dismissed; record does not support extraordinary ability standard.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No one-time achievement of major, internationally recognized award established
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner ranks in small percentage at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No one-time achievement of major, internationally recognized award established | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner ranks in small percentage at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
