Outcome: Dismissed
AUG222018_02B2203
Our summary
An audiologist claimed extraordinary ability through five evidentiary criteria. The AAO found only scholarly articles criterion met. Awards, membership, published material about petitioner, and artistic exhibition criteria were rejected. Without three criteria met, final merits review was unnecessary. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Scholarly articles · Director found and AAO concurred petitioner authored published scholarly articles
What was missing
- Awards · Awards received during degree program not nationally or internationally recognized
- Exhibitions · Research posters at scientific conferences do not qualify as artistic exhibitions
- Membership · No evidence of Clinical Competency Certificate receipt or analogous association membership
- Published material · Self-promotional materials about petitioner have little evidentiary weight
- Final merits · Only one criterion met; three required; no final merits analysis necessary
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found and AAO concurred petitioner authored published scholarly articles | |
| Not met | Awards received during degree program not nationally or internationally recognized | |
| Not met | Research posters at scientific conferences do not qualify as artistic exhibitions | |
| Not met | No evidence of Clinical Competency Certificate receipt or analogous association membership | |
| Not met | Self-promotional materials about petitioner have little evidentiary weight | |
| Not met | Only one criterion met; three required; no final merits analysis necessary |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
