Outcome: Dismissed
AUG222022_02B5203
Our summary
A civil engineer proposed a consulting business offering services to road and highway construction companies. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the specific endeavor has national importance under Dhanasar; describing the general importance of infrastructure and infrastructure priorities was insufficient without showing prospective impact.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor in road and highway construction consulting lacks demonstrated national importance; general industry importance insufficient without prospective impact
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Proposed endeavor in road and highway construction consulting lacks demonstrated national importance; general industry importance insufficient without prospective impact | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; second and third prongs not reached | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; second and third prongs not reached |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
