EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided August 2024Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
AUG222024_08B5203
Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A scientist with advanced degree sought waiver to develop sensor technology reducing heavy metal poisoning. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner materially altered the proposed endeavor between initial filing and RFE response, creating inconsistency that prevented analysis of national importance.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Petitioner provided inconsistent and contradictory descriptions of proposed endeavor regarding heavy metal reduction technology, preventing coherent analysis.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Not met | Petitioner provided inconsistent and contradictory descriptions of proposed endeavor regarding heavy metal reduction technology, preventing coherent analysis. |
 Well positioned | Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong fails; ambiguity in endeavor definition precluded analysis. |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong fails; ambiguity in endeavor definition precluded analysis. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.