Outcome: Dismissed
AUG222025_05B2203
Our summary
A financial manager sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming three criteria: membership, original contributions, and a leading or critical role. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the membership criterion was not satisfied, so the three-criteria threshold could not be met. The other claimed criteria and the final merits were not decided.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Membership · No evidence that the associations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No evidence that the associations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed because three criteria could not be met. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed because three criteria could not be met. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | No formal final merits determination was made; record reviewed in aggregate only as an advisory remark. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
