Outcome: Dismissed
AUG242022_02B2203
Our summary
Martial arts competitor and coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Satisfied awards and judging criteria only. AAO rejected membership claim lacking expert recognition documentation and published material claim lacking proper attribution and venue. Failed to meet three-criterion threshold or demonstrate top-of-field extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Director found petitioner satisfied awards criterion; AAO agreed
- Judging · Director found petitioner satisfied judging criterion; AAO agreed
What was missing
- Membership · Submitted evidence did not demonstrate membership based on recognition of outstanding achievements by national or international experts
- Published material · Articles mention petitioner but lack required title, date, author; not published in professional or major trade publications about petitioner's work
- Final merits · Petitioner satisfied only two of required three criteria; failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner satisfied awards criterion; AAO agreed | |
| Met | Director found petitioner satisfied judging criterion; AAO agreed | |
| Not met | Submitted evidence did not demonstrate membership based on recognition of outstanding achievements by national or international experts | |
| Not met | Articles mention petitioner but lack required title, date, author; not published in professional or major trade publications about petitioner's work | |
| Not met | Petitioner satisfied only two of required three criteria; failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
