EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalIndividualDecided August 2022Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
AUG252022_01B5203
Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot metBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A dental medical scientist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner met the underlying advanced degree requirement but failed to establish a consistent, clearly defined proposed endeavor with substantial merit and national importance, and was not well positioned to advance the work due to lack of U.S. dental practice qualification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor lacked clear definition and specificity; unclear sequence and timing of activities; insufficient evidence of national economic impact or job creation
- Well positioned · Petitioner not qualified to practice dentistry in United States; expert opinion lacked qualification and probative value
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Not met | Proposed endeavor lacked clear definition and specificity; unclear sequence and timing of activities; insufficient evidence of national economic impact or job creation |
 Well positioned | Not met | Petitioner not qualified to practice dentistry in United States; expert opinion lacked qualification and probative value |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | First two prongs failed; third prong not reached as unnecessary to decision |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.