Outcome: Dismissed
AUG262022_01B2203
Our summary
Tattoo artist claimed five criteria for extraordinary ability classification. Met two initial evidentiary criteria but failed three additional ones: awards lacked national significance, original contributions not demonstrated, and critical role unsubstantiated. AAO affirmed dismissal; evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Director determined petitioner fulfilled artistic display criterion on initial review
- Published material · Director determined petitioner fulfilled published material criterion on initial review
What was missing
- Awards · Awards lack sufficient information on selection criteria or national or international significance
- Leading or critical role · Insufficient evidence of critical role; promotional work and sponsorships do not establish critical outcomes
- Original contributions · Insufficient evidence showing original contributions of major significance; letters lack specifics
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director determined petitioner fulfilled artistic display criterion on initial review | |
| Met | Director determined petitioner fulfilled published material criterion on initial review | |
| Not met | Awards lack sufficient information on selection criteria or national or international significance | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of critical role; promotional work and sponsorships do not establish critical outcomes | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence showing original contributions of major significance; letters lack specifics |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
