Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided August 2022Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

AUG262022_01B2203

ExhibitionsMetPublished materialMetAwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot met

Our summary

Tattoo artist claimed five criteria for extraordinary ability classification. Met two initial evidentiary criteria but failed three additional ones: awards lacked national significance, original contributions not demonstrated, and critical role unsubstantiated. AAO affirmed dismissal; evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim.

Official PDF

The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Director determined petitioner fulfilled artistic display criterion on initial review
  • Published material · Director determined petitioner fulfilled published material criterion on initial review

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards lack sufficient information on selection criteria or national or international significance
  • Leading or critical role · Insufficient evidence of critical role; promotional work and sponsorships do not establish critical outcomes
  • Original contributions · Insufficient evidence showing original contributions of major significance; letters lack specifics

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetDirector determined petitioner fulfilled artistic display criterion on initial review
Published materialMetDirector determined petitioner fulfilled published material criterion on initial review
AwardsNot metAwards lack sufficient information on selection criteria or national or international significance
Leading or critical roleNot metInsufficient evidence of critical role; promotional work and sponsorships do not establish critical outcomes
Original contributionsNot metInsufficient evidence showing original contributions of major significance; letters lack specifics

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.