EB-1ALife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided August 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
AUG262025_05B2203
JudgingMetScholarly articlesMetOriginal contributionsNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
Molecular biologist in computational biology claimed three criteria. AAO found petitioner met judging and scholarly articles criteria but not original contributions of major significance, as letters lacked evidence of realized or implemented contributions, and citations alone without field context do not establish major significance. With only two criteria met, appeal was dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Record indicates petitioner judged work of others in field
- Scholarly articles · Petitioner met burden to demonstrate authorship of scholarly articles
What was missing
- Original contributions · Letters showed work advanced technologies but did not demonstrate major significance; high citations alone insufficient without context
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Judging | Met | Record indicates petitioner judged work of others in field |
 Scholarly articles | Met | Petitioner met burden to demonstrate authorship of scholarly articles |
 Original contributions | Not met | Letters showed work advanced technologies but did not demonstrate major significance; high citations alone insufficient without context |
 Awards | Claimed, not analyzed | No major internationally recognized award claimed |
 Commercial success | Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner |
 Exhibitions | Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner |
 High salary | Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner |
 Leading or critical role | Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner |
 Membership | Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner |
 Published material | Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner |
 Final merits | Not reached / not discussed | Petitioner satisfied only two of three required criteria; final merits determination not reached |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.