Outcome: Dismissed
AUG312005_01B2203
Our summary
A former athlete and sports consultant claimed extraordinary ability through awards, original contributions, scholarly articles, and leading critical role. The AAO found that past athletic accomplishments and subsequent business work failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Past athletic acclaim not sustained through subsequent employment in athletic-related business or ministry work
- Leading or critical role · Past leadership positions as athlete alone do not establish sustained acclaim through subsequent work in sports management or ministry
- Original contributions · Past athletic contributions alone insufficient; record shows only past not sustained acclaim; no major business contributions demonstrated
- Scholarly articles · One co-authored article published in 2004 does not demonstrate authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications
- Final merits · Evidence indicates accomplished former athlete and consultant but does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Past athletic acclaim not sustained through subsequent employment in athletic-related business or ministry work | |
| Not met | Past leadership positions as athlete alone do not establish sustained acclaim through subsequent work in sports management or ministry | |
| Not met | Past athletic contributions alone insufficient; record shows only past not sustained acclaim; no major business contributions demonstrated | |
| Not met | One co-authored article published in 2004 does not demonstrate authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications | |
| Not met | Evidence indicates accomplished former athlete and consultant but does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
