EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided 2010Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Apr012010_01B2203
AwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
A business software developer claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, arguing he met at least three criteria. The AAO found his awards lacked evidence of international recognition, his original contributions were unsupported by objective evidence, and his overall achievements did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · China ERP Software Association awards lack evidence of national or international recognition beyond presenting organization.
- Original contributions · Solicited letters from acquaintances do not establish original contributions of major significance at national or international level.
- Final merits · Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner ranks among small percentage at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | China ERP Software Association awards lack evidence of national or international recognition beyond presenting organization. |
 Original contributions | Not met | Solicited letters from acquaintances do not establish original contributions of major significance at national or international level. |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner ranks among small percentage at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.