EB-1AComputer science and AIIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Apr022009_02B2203
AwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Scientist in optical engineering sought extraordinary ability classification. Failed to establish nationally recognized awards or original contributions of major significance. Did not meet three required criteria or demonstrate sustained acclaim at the very top level of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Award lacks documentation of selection criteria, scope of candidates, or national or international recognition
- Original contributions · No evidence of original scientific contributions of major significance despite good employment record
- Final merits · Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Award lacks documentation of selection criteria, scope of candidates, or national or international recognition |
 Original contributions | Not met | No evidence of original scientific contributions of major significance despite good employment record |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.