Outcome: Sustained
Apr102008_01B2203
Our summary
Scientist in physics research sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed at least three criteria including judging, original contributions in spintronics devices, and scholarly articles with 89 citations. AAO sustained, finding NSF review participation, innovative published research, and citation impact demonstrated sustained national acclaim and extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · NSF proposal review participation demonstrates significance; multiple research papers submitted for publication and presentation
- Original contributions · Spintronics device work published in Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials; demonstrated extraordinary technical innovation
- Scholarly articles · Evidence shows 89 cites to published articles; significant scholarly impact demonstrated
- Final merits · Totality of evidence establishes overall pattern of sustained national acclaim and extraordinary ability in sciences
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | NSF proposal review participation demonstrates significance; multiple research papers submitted for publication and presentation | |
| Met | Spintronics device work published in Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials; demonstrated extraordinary technical innovation | |
| Met | Evidence shows 89 cites to published articles; significant scholarly impact demonstrated | |
| Met | Totality of evidence establishes overall pattern of sustained national acclaim and extraordinary ability in sciences |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
