Outcome: Dismissed
Apr102009_01B2203
Our summary
Martial artist and nonprofit organization founder claimed extraordinary ability through athletic achievements and planned business activities. AAO affirmed denial, finding no evidence of nationally recognized competitive prizes since 2001, no qualifying published material, and no clear commitment to expertise area in the United States.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes; participation certificates insufficient; no sustained acclaim since 2001
- Published material · Photographs alone do not constitute published material about the petitioner as required
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to meet at least three regulatory criteria; evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes; participation certificates insufficient; no sustained acclaim since 2001 | |
| Not met | Photographs alone do not constitute published material about the petitioner as required | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to meet at least three regulatory criteria; evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
