Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided 2006Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Apr142006_05B2203

AwardsNot metCommercial successNot metHigh salaryNot metOriginal contributionsNot metExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

Self-petitioner business operations specialist sought extraordinary ability classification. Claimed criteria relating to awards, contributions, and commercial success supported by tenant testimonies and consulate reference. AAO found regulatory criteria applied to business field and petitioner failed to meet any three; letter testimonies insufficient without meeting specific regulatory documentation requirements.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Petitioner submitted only recommendation letters, not awards or prizes
  • Commercial success · Petitioner did not demonstrate distinguished business reputation
  • High salary · Petitioner's wages not demonstrated to be significantly high
  • Original contributions · Petitioner's success did not rise to level of major significance to field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metPetitioner submitted only recommendation letters, not awards or prizes
Commercial successNot metPetitioner did not demonstrate distinguished business reputation
High salaryNot metPetitioner's wages not demonstrated to be significantly high
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner's success did not rise to level of major significance to field
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.