Outcome: Dismissed
Apr202007_03B2203
Our summary
Self-petitioner plant physiologist sought EB-1A classification based on provincial award, articles, and researcher position in China. AAO found petitioner failed to meet three criteria and lacked sustained acclaim or evidence of continuing work in United States expertise.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Provincial award lacked evidence of significance, recipient numbers, or competitive pool; not national or international recognition.
- Leading or critical role · Vice-director appointment letter actually documented researcher position, not vice-director role claimed.
- Original contributions · No evidence of contributions of major significance to field.
- Scholarly articles · Articles not published in major or professional trade publications or major media.
- Final merits · No sustained acclaim at filing; any prior notoriety in China not sustained two years later; no evidence of continuation plans in United States.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Provincial award lacked evidence of significance, recipient numbers, or competitive pool; not national or international recognition. | |
| Not met | Vice-director appointment letter actually documented researcher position, not vice-director role claimed. | |
| Not met | No evidence of contributions of major significance to field. | |
| Not met | Articles not published in major or professional trade publications or major media. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed as distinct criterion in decision. | |
| Not met | No sustained acclaim at filing; any prior notoriety in China not sustained two years later; no evidence of continuation plans in United States. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
