EB-1ABusiness and managementEmployerDecided 2008Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Apr222008_04B2203
AwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Business strategist and developer claimed extraordinary ability in strategic brand management. AAO found evidence of talent but not sustained national or international acclaim or top-level status. Awards, publications, and influence claims all inadequately documented.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence individual received awards; alleged awards not established as business-related or nationally recognized
- Original contributions · No evidence strategies original or influential within entire field of marketing; corporate use alone insufficient
- Published material · Stanford student newspaper and Harvard Business School Working Knowledge not nationally circulated major media
- Final merits · Evidence shows talent but not sustained national or international acclaim at top-level business strategist
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | No evidence individual received awards; alleged awards not established as business-related or nationally recognized |
 Original contributions | Not met | No evidence strategies original or influential within entire field of marketing; corporate use alone insufficient |
 Published material | Not met | Stanford student newspaper and Harvard Business School Working Knowledge not nationally circulated major media |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence shows talent but not sustained national or international acclaim at top-level business strategist |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.