Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Counsel requested 150 days to submit additional evidence and argument but provided no specific items or reasons. AAO dismissed appeal summarily for failure to identify erroneous conclusions of law or fact and failure to submit additional evidence within allotted time.

A petition for extraordinary ability classification was denied by the service center for lack of sustained acclaim. On appeal, counsel requested 150 extra days for a brief but never submitted anything or identified specific errors. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal without analyzing any criteria.

Elvis performer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed three criteria: lesser awards, published material, and high salary. AAO found no nationally recognized prize, one article insufficient for sustained acclaim, no salary documentation. Petition lacks evidence of sustained acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

An artist and businessperson sought EB-1A classification claiming multiple criteria. The AAO found published material insufficient, newspaper not major media, and original contributions lacking demonstrated major significance. Three criteria met not established.