Outcome: Dismissed
Apr232012_05B2203
Our summary
Musician-petitioner claimed four evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO found petitioner did not meet awards (World Youth Choir participation insufficient), membership (employment-based only), or original contributions (institutional level only). Failure to submit three qualifying categories and lack of sustained national or international acclaim led to dismissal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Participation in World Youth Choir not equivalent to nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
- Membership · Membership based on vocal talent and music experience does not constitute outstanding achievement; employment-based eligibility insufficient.
- Original contributions · Contributions limited to educational institution, workshop, or community; lack major significance in field.
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to meet three required evidentiary criteria; burden not sustained to show sustained acclaim.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Participation in World Youth Choir not equivalent to nationally or internationally recognized prize or award. | |
| Not met | Membership based on vocal talent and music experience does not constitute outstanding achievement; employment-based eligibility insufficient. | |
| Not met | Contributions limited to educational institution, workshop, or community; lack major significance in field. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not contest director's finding on appeal. | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to meet three required evidentiary criteria; burden not sustained to show sustained acclaim. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
