Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2012Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Apr232012_05B2203

AwardsNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metJudgingClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Musician-petitioner claimed four evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO found petitioner did not meet awards (World Youth Choir participation insufficient), membership (employment-based only), or original contributions (institutional level only). Failure to submit three qualifying categories and lack of sustained national or international acclaim led to dismissal.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Participation in World Youth Choir not equivalent to nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
  • Membership · Membership based on vocal talent and music experience does not constitute outstanding achievement; employment-based eligibility insufficient.
  • Original contributions · Contributions limited to educational institution, workshop, or community; lack major significance in field.
  • Final merits · Petitioner failed to meet three required evidentiary criteria; burden not sustained to show sustained acclaim.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metParticipation in World Youth Choir not equivalent to nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
MembershipNot metMembership based on vocal talent and music experience does not constitute outstanding achievement; employment-based eligibility insufficient.
Original contributionsNot metContributions limited to educational institution, workshop, or community; lack major significance in field.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not contest director's finding on appeal.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner failed to meet three required evidentiary criteria; burden not sustained to show sustained acclaim.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.