Outcome: Dismissed
Apr292009_03B2203
Our summary
An artist self-petitioner claimed awards, membership, published material, and judging criteria. The AAO found no nationally or internationally recognized awards met the criterion; membership lacked outstanding achievement requirement; published materials lacked certified translations; and judging role did not indicate extraordinary acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Record does not establish petitioner meets this criterion
- Judging · Membership in judging organization not based on outstanding achievement; evaluations do not indicate national or international acclaim
- Membership · Membership requirements based on employment, education, test scores, or dues do not constitute outstanding achievement
- Published material · Petitioner failed to submit certified translations required by regulation
- Final merits · Evidence in aggregate does not distinguish petitioner as one of small percentage at very top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Record does not establish petitioner meets this criterion | |
| Not met | Membership in judging organization not based on outstanding achievement; evaluations do not indicate national or international acclaim | |
| Not met | Membership requirements based on employment, education, test scores, or dues do not constitute outstanding achievement | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to submit certified translations required by regulation | |
| Not met | Evidence in aggregate does not distinguish petitioner as one of small percentage at very top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
