Outcome: Dismissed
Apr292010_01B2203
Our summary
Self-petitioner in athletics claims extraordinary ability based on world karate title from 1993. AAO found the award does not meet the narrow threshold for a major internationally recognized award and the evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · World karate title in 1993 does not qualify as major internationally recognized award under narrow interpretation
- Final merits · Evidence not persuasive that petitioner significantly above almost all others in field at national or international level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | World karate title in 1993 does not qualify as major internationally recognized award under narrow interpretation | |
| Not met | Evidence not persuasive that petitioner significantly above almost all others in field at national or international level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
