Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureEmployerDecided 2007Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Aug032007_05B2203

AwardsNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Employer-sponsored petition for beneficiary claiming extraordinary ability in the arts. Previously approved petition revoked. Award analyzed and found to reflect only provincial recognition. No clear evidence of continued work in area of expertise in United States. Revocation sustained.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Youth or juvenile award reflects provincial, not national or international recognition
  • Final merits · Petition revocation sustained; award does not demonstrate very top of field status

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metYouth or juvenile award reflects provincial, not national or international recognition
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in detail
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Final meritsNot metPetition revocation sustained; award does not demonstrate very top of field status

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.