EB-1AMathematics and statisticsIndividualDecided 2010Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Aug042010_05B2203
AwardsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Mathematician specializing in harmonic theory of geometry and analysis claimed extraordinary ability based on awards and citations. AAO dismissed the appeal because awards lacked recognition and citations merely referenced work without evaluating impact or standing, failing to show sustained acclaim at the very top.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Submitted evidence did not establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field.
- Published material · Citations to petitioner's work in other articles lack discussion of merits, standing, or impact; footnoted references without evaluation are minimal probative value.
- Final merits · Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or demonstrate mathematician is within small percentage at very top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Submitted evidence did not establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field. |
 Published material | Not met | Citations to petitioner's work in other articles lack discussion of merits, standing, or impact; footnoted references without evaluation are minimal probative value. |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or demonstrate mathematician is within small percentage at very top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.